Skip to main content

Iraq protests explained

Thaier al-Sudani/Reuters (Feb 6, 2020)

On Tuesday, May 25, 2021, hundreds of protestors took to the streets in Baghdad, Iraq, protesting the rise in targeted killings of anti-government activists and journalists. What started as a largely peaceful demonstration in Tahrir Square quickly became violent as Iraqi security forces used tear gas and fired live rounds in the air to disperse the protestors. In retaliation, the protestors hurled stones and bricks at the security forces. As a result of the clashes, dozens were injured and one protester was shot, who later died in the hospital. 

But why did these protests begin in the first place?


On May 9, 2021, activist and key organiser of the October 2019 anti-government protests, Ihab Jawad al-Wazni was killed by gunmen in front of his home in Karbala, Iraq. Protestors demanded accountability from the government, giving it two weeks to name and bring his killers to justice. Many activists and demonstrators believe Iran-backed militias to be the perpetrators. Because the Iraqi government failed to publicly identify or arrest any suspects within this time frame, these fresh protests erupted on the 25th. 


Anti-government protests are not news in Iraq. In 2011, protests broke out in various provinces denouncing corruption and nepotism and demanding better services and wages. Protestors faced suppression by excessive force, police brutality and arrests. Similarly, since October 2019, demonstrations, marches, sit-ins, and civil disobedience have begun as the people were disappointed and angered by the high unemployment rates, government incompetence, and lack of accountability, among other things. Over 500 people were killed as armed forces used live ammunition, tear canisters and hot water to disperse the crowds. Following this, the government imposed a curfew and an internet shutdown. The Human Rights Watch condemned the use of excessive lethal force by the security forces and denounced authorities’ interference in media.


The 2019 protests led to the resignation of then-Prime Minister Adil Abd al-Mahdi in November that year, bringing the Mustafa al-Kadhimi-led government to power.


al-Wazni’s murder this year was not an isolated incident. In July last year, leading security analyst and expert on armed groups Dr Hisham al-Hashimi was murdered by unknown gunmen in Baghdad. On May 10 this year, Ahmad Hassan, a television reporter for Alforat TV, was shot in the head. He survived the attack and is now recovering after undergoing brain surgery. 


That brings the number up to nearly 35 activists having been killed and about 82 documented attempted killings since October 2019, according to the Iraqi High Commission for Human Rights (IHCHR). It has also warned of "a new wave of targeting and assassinating activists, journalists, and opinion makers".This has created a looming fear among those critical of the government, causing many of them to leave the country and seek refuge elsewhere. Belkis Wille, a senior researcher at Human Rights Watch, said that those that are still living at home have been silenced because they fear that speaking out could cost them their lives.



But there has been some much-needed progress. On May 26, the Iraqi government arrested Qassim Mahmoud Musleh, a commander of the Popular Mobilisation Forces or PMF, on the charges of corruption and complicity in the assassinations of Ihab al-Wazni and another activist in Karbala. Does this mean some law and order is settling into the country? Only time will tell.


You can watch the video here.


 




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Understanding spectator violence among English football fans

Jane Austen was undoubtedly right when she wrote in one of her most-loved books Pride and Prejudice : “Angry people are not always wise.” Anger and the set of emotions and behaviours that accompany it, cause it or occur as a result of it, are not usually explainable with rationality. While they’re certainly not excusable, they do provide insight into human behaviour and help us answer the big questions of why and how we behave the way we do .  In July, English football fans made headlines in news reports worldwide for their hooliganism and other acts of violence after the English national team lost the final match against Italy in the Euro Cup 2020. Their aggression was well-documented across news channels and social media but since it is not particularly ‘news’, these behaviours have also been the subject of many social and behavioural psychologists’ curiosity and research for many years prior. All of these acts collectively have a term of their own - Soccer hooliganism.  Eng...

Our existence is beyond numbers on a scale

The year is 2035. You log into your social media account. The first thing you see is someone sharing an account of their journey as a model over the years. It fills you with joy to see something so positive. But then, you see some troll-like account shaming this person for how they look below their photograph. That disgusts you. You log off of social media before you can hit ‘send’ on that scathing reply you spent 15 minutes typing. Not today, you decide.  Later that day, you are reminded of that random comment. You found the person who posted their photo beautiful and empowering. The person that commented below the same picture didn’t. They chose to sit behind the curtain of anonymity that the internet provided and called someone ‘wrinkly and ugly.’ That doesn’t sit right with you. You think - ‘that person’s concept of beauty must be something else entirely.’ Hmm, is it really that, though? ‘Oh! Or that maybe, they’re just a very rude and sad person hating others online.’ There. T...

Can we afford total freedom of expression in India?

The short, simple answer is no. A longer answer is, however, complex to understand.  India is a diverse country, with hundreds of languages spoken and cultural groups all living within the same national border. We are governed by a government at the centre that makes and executes laws for a population of 1.3 billion people spread across the nation. It is, therefore, the government’s responsibility to ensure that peace is maintained among these diverse groups of people and that there is no outbreak of violence because of a comment or an act that can disrupt peace. While the Constitution of India recognises freedom of speech and expression as a Fundamental Right and guarantees to all its citizens the right to express themselves freely via written, spoken or printed material, we don’t have to go too far to realise that this right is not absolute.  A major socio-political challenge we face today is the intermingling of religion and politics.   These two have taken preced...